Decision Support Systems Research Papers

  • Alavi, M. and Carlson, P. (1992). A Review of MIS Research and Disciplinary Development, Journal of Management Information Systems8(4): 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Anthony, R.N. (1965). Planning and Control Systems: A framework for analysis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Arnott, D. and Pervan, G. (2005). A Critical Analysis of Decision Support Systems Research, Journal of Information Technology20(2): 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Arnott, D. and Pervan, G. (2008). Eight Key Issues for the Decision Support Systems Discipline, Decision Support Systems44(3): 657–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Arnott, D. and Pervan, G. (2010). How Relevant is Fieldwork to DSS Design-Science Research? in A. Respicio, F. Adam, G. Phillips-Wren, C Teixeira and J. Telhada (eds.) Bridging the Socio-Technical Gap in Decision Support Systems: Challenges for the next decade, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 199–210.Google Scholar

  • Arnott, D. and Pervan, G. (2012). Design Science in Decision Support Systems Research: An assessment using the Hevner, March, Park, and Ram guidelines, Journal of the Association for Information Systems13(11): 923–949.Google Scholar

  • Arnott, D., Pervan, G. and Dodson, G. (2005). Who Pays for Decision Support Systems Research? Review, Directions and Issues, Communications of the Association for Information Systems16: 356–380.Google Scholar

  • Baskerville, R. (2008). What Design Science is Not, European Journal of Information Systems17(5): 441–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Benbasat, I. and Barki, H. (2007). Quo Vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems8(4): 211–218.Google Scholar

  • Benbasat, I. and Nault, B. (1990). An Evaluation of Empirical Research in Managerial Support Systems, Decision Support Systems6(3): 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Bragge, J., Korhonen, P., Wallenius, H. and Wallenius, J. (2012). Scholarly Communities of Research in Multiple Criteria Decision Making: A bibliometric research profiling study, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 11(2): 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Briggs, R.O., de Vreede, G.-J. and Nunamaker, Jr. J.F. (2003). Collaboration engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems, Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4): 31–64.Google Scholar

  • Brown, B., Court, D. and Willmott, P. (2013). Mobilizing your C-suite for Big Data Analytics, McKinsey Quarterly, November.Google Scholar

  • Cavaye, A.L.M. (1996). Case Study Research: A multi-faceted research approach for IS, Information Systems Journal6(3): 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, H., Chiang, R. and Storey, V. (2012). Business Intelligence and Analytics: From big data to big impact, MIS Quarterly36(4): 1165–1188.Google Scholar

  • Chen, W.S. and Hirschheim, R. (2004). A Paradigmatic and Methodological Examination of Information Systems Research from 1991 to 2001, Information Systems Journal14(3): 197–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Chiang, R.H.L., Goes, P. and Stohr, E.A. (2012). Business Intelligence and Analytics Education, and Program Development: A unique opportunity for the information systems discipline, ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems3(3): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, Jr T.D., Jones, M.C. and Armstrong, C.P. (2007). The Dynamic Structure of Management Support Systems: Theory development, research focus, and direction, MIS Quarterly31(3): 579–615.Google Scholar

  • Davenport, T.H. (2006). Competing on Analytics, Harvard Business Review84(1): 98–107.Google Scholar

  • Davenport, T.H. and Harris, J.G. (2007). Competing on Analytics: The new science of winning, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

  • Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly13(3): 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Delen, D. and Crossland, M.D. (2008). Seeding the Survey and Analysis of Research Literature with Text Mining, Expert Systems with Applications34(3): 1707–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A ten-year update, Journal of Management Information Systems19(4): 9–30.Google Scholar

  • Dennis, A.R., Carte, T.A. and Kelly, G.G. (2003). Breaking the Rules: Success and failure in groupware-supported business process reengineering, Decision Support Systems36(1): 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Dennis, A.R., Tyran, C.K., Vogel, D.R. and Nunamaker, Jr J.F. (1997). Group Support Systems for Strategic Planning, Journal of Management Information Systems14(1): 155–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Galliers, R.D. (1991). Choosing Appropriate Information Systems Research Approaches: A revised taxonomy, in H.-E. Nissen, H.K. Klein and R. Hirschheim (eds.) Information Systems Research: Contemporary approaches and emergent traditions, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 327–345.Google Scholar

  • Galliers, R.D. and Meadows, M. (2003). A Discipline Divided: Globalization and parochialism in information systems research, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 11: 108–117.Google Scholar

  • Gartner (2007). Creating Enterprise Leverage: The 2007 CIO agenda (Gartner EXP CIO Report), Stamford, CT: Gartner Inc.Google Scholar

  • Gartner (2008). Gartner says worldwide business intelligence platform market grew 13 percent in 2007, Gartner Newsroom, [WWW document] http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=700410 (accessed 7 November 2012).

  • Gartner (2009). Gartner says worldwide business intelligence, analytics and performance management grew 22 percent in 2008, Gartner Newsroom, [WWW document] http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1017812 (accessed 7 November 2012).

  • Gartner (2010). Gartner says worldwide business intelligence, analytics and performance management software market grew 4 percent in 2009, Gartner Newsroom, [WWW document] http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1357514 (accessed 7 November 2012).

  • Gartner (2011). Gartner says worldwide business intelligence, analytics and performance management software market surpassed the $10 billion mark in 2010, Gartner Newsroom, [WWW document] http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1642714 (accessed 7 November 2012).

  • Gartner (2012a). Amplifying the Enterprise: The 2012 Gartner CIO agenda report, Stamford, CT: Gartner Inc.Google Scholar

  • Gartner (2012b). Gartner says worldwide business intelligence, analytics and performance management software market surpassed the $12 billion mark in 2011, Gartner Newsroom, [WWW document] http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1971516 (accessed 7 November 2012).

  • Gartner (2013a). Gartner predicts business intelligence and analytics will remain top focus for CIOs through 2017, Gartner Newsroom, [WWW document] http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2637615 (accessed 18 February 2014).

  • Gartner (2013b). Gartner says worldwide business intelligence software revenue to grow 7 percent in 2013, Gartner Newsroom, [WWW document] http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2340216 (accessed 18 February 2014).

  • Germonprez, M., Hovorka, D. and Gal, U. (2011). Secondary Design: A case of behavioral design science research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems12(10): 662–683.Google Scholar

  • Goodhue, D.L. and Thompson, R.L. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance, MIS Quarterly19(2): 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Gorry, G.A. and Scott Morton, M.S. (1971). A Framework for Management Information Systems, Sloan Management Review13(1): 1–22.Google Scholar

  • Gottschalk, P. (2000). Predictors of IT Support For Knowledge Management in the Professions: An empirical study of law firms in Norway, Journal of Information Technology15(1): 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Gregor, S. and Jones, D. (2007). The Anatomy of a Design Theory, Journal of the Association for Information Systems8(5): 312–335.Google Scholar

  • Guo, Z. and Sheffield, J. (2008). A Paradigmatic and Methodological Examination of Knowledge Management Research: 2000 to 2004, Decision Support Systems44(3): 673–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Hevner, A.R. (2007). The Three Cycle View of Design Science Research, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems19(2): 87–92.Google Scholar

  • Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J. and Ram, S. (2004). Design Science in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly28(1): 75–106.Google Scholar

  • Hirschheim, R. (2007). Introduction to the Special Issue on ‘Quo Vadis TAM — Issues and reflections on technology acceptance research’, Journal of the Association for Information Systems8(4): 203–205.Google Scholar

  • Hosack, B., Hall, D., Paradice, D. and Courtney, J.F. (2012). A Look Toward the Future: Decision support is alive and well, Journal of the Association for Information Systems13(5): 315–340.Google Scholar

  • Hwang, H.-G., Ku, C.-Y., Yen, D. and Cheng, C.C. (2004). Critical Factors Influencing the Adoption of Data Warehouse Technology: A study of the banking industry in Taiwan, Decision Support Systems37(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Indulska, M. and Recker, J.C. (2008). Design Science in IS Research: A literature analysis, in S. Gregor and S. Ho (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Biennial ANU Workshop on Information Systems Foundations, Canberra, Australia: ANU.Google Scholar

  • Iivari, J. (2007). A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems as a Design Science, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems19(2): 39–64.Google Scholar

  • Jourdan, Z., Rainer, R.K. and Marshall, T.E. (2008). Business Intelligence: An analysis of the literature, Information Systems Management25(2): 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast and Slow, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

  • Kuechler, W. and Vaishnavi, V. (2012). A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple perspectives, Journal of the Association for Information Systems13(6): 395–423.Google Scholar

  • Lee, A.S. (2010). Retrospect and Prospect: Information systems research in the last and next 25 years, Journal of Information Technology25(4): 336–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Leidner, D.E., Carlsson, S., Elam, J. and Corrales, M. (1999). Mexican and Swedish Managers’ Perceptions of the Impact of EIS on Organizational Intelligence, Decision Making, and Structure, Decision Sciences30(3): 633–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewin, K. (1943). Defining the ‘Field at a Given Time’, Psychological Review50(3): 292–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Lipshitz, R. and Bar-Ilan, O. (1996). How Problems are Solved: Reconsidering the phase theorem, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes65(1): 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • March, S. and Smith, G.F. (1995). Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology, Decision Support Systems15(4): 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Marginson, D., King, M. and McAulay, L. (2000). Executives’ Use of Information Technology: Comparison of electronic mail and an accounting information system, Journal of Information Technology15(2): 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • McAfee, A. and Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big Data: The management revolution, Harvard Business Review (October): 61–68.Google Scholar

  • Nandhakumar, J. (1996). Design for Success?: Critical success factors in executive information systems development, European Journal of Information Systems5(1): 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Neuman, W.L. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 4th edn, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

  • Osareh, F. (1996). Bibliometrics, Citation Analysis and Co-Citation Analysis: A review of literature I, Libri46(3): 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Power, D.J. (2012). A brief history of decision support systems (version 4.1). [www document] http://dssresources.com/history/dsshistory.html, accessed 3 July 2012.

  • Ross, J.W., Beath, C.M. and Quaadgras, A. (2013). You May Not Need Big Data After All, Harvard Business Review (December): 90–98.Google Scholar

  • Rouibah, K. and Ould-ali, S. (2002). PUZZLE: A concept and prototype for linking business intelligence to business strategy, Journal of Strategic Information Systems11(2): 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Salo, A. and Kakola, T.K. (2005). Groupware Support for Requirements Management in New Product Development, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce15(4): 253–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Shander, B. (2013). Does your company actually need data visualization? HBR blog network [www document] http://blogs.hbr.org (accessed 14 November 2013).

  • Shanks, G., Jagielska, I. and Jayaganesh, M. (2009). A Framework for Understanding Customer Relationship Management Systems Benefits, Communications of the Association for Information Systems25: 263–288.Google Scholar

  • Simon, H.A. (1960). The New Science of Management Decision, New York: Harper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, H., Dillon, S. and Van Wingen, M. (2010). Focus and Diversity in Information Systems Research: Meeting the dual demands of a healthy applied discipline, MIS Quarterly34(4): 647–667.Google Scholar

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice, Science211(4487): 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Vaishnavi, V.K. and Kuechler, Jnr W. (2008). Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating information and communication technology, Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach Publications.Google Scholar

  • Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J. and Baskerville, R. (2012). A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research, in K. Peffers, M. Rothenberger and B Kuechler (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Design Science in Information Systems (DESRIST’12) Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 423–438.Google Scholar

  • Watson, H.J., Fuller, C. and Ariyachandra, T. (2004). Data Warehouse Governance: Best practices at blue cross and blue shield of North Carolina, Decision Support Systems38(3): 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, H.J., Goodhue, D.L. and Wixom, B.H. (2002). The Benefits of Data Warehousing: Why some organizations realize exceptional payoffs, Information & Management39(6): 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R. and El Sawy, O.A. (1992). Building an Information Systems Design Theory for Vigilant EIS, Information Systems Research3(1): 36–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Weber, R.P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis, 2nd edn, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • Webster, J. and Watson, R.T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a literature review, MIS Quarterly26(2): xiii–xxiii.Google Scholar

  • Winter, R. (2008). Design Science Research in Europe, European Journal of Information Systems17(5): 470–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Yin, R.K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and methods, 2nd edn, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • Zikmund, W.G., Babin, B.J., Carr, J.C. and Griffin, M. (2010). Business Research Methods, 8th edn, Mason, OH: South-Western, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

  • Ackoff, R.L. (1967). Management Misinformation Systems, Management Science 14(4): 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Alavi, M. and Carlson, P. (1992). A Review of MIS Research and Disciplinary Development, Journal of Management Information Systems 8(4): 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Alavi, M. and Joachimsthaler, E.A. (1992). Revisiting DSS Implementation Research: A meta-analysis of the literature and suggestions for researchers, MIS Quarterly 16(1): 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly 25(1): 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Alter, S.L. (1980). Decision Support Systems: Current practice and continuing challenges,, Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

  • Anthony, R.N. (1965). Planning and Control Systems: A framework for analysis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.Google Scholar

  • Arnott, D. (2004). Decision Support Systems Evolution: Framework, case study and research agenda, European Journal of Information Systems 13(4): 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Arrow, K.J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Basu, A. and Blanning, R.W. (1994). Metagraphs: A tool for modelling decision support systems, Management Science 40(12): 1579–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Benbasat, I. and Nault, B. (1990). An Evaluation of Empirical Research in Managerial Support Systems, Decision Support Systems 6: 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R.W. (1999). Empirical Research in Information Systems: The question of relevance, MIS Quarterly 23(1): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Benbunan-Fich, R., Hiltz, S.R. and Turoff, M. (2002). A Comparative Content Analysis of Face-to-face vs. Asynchronous Group Decision Making, Decision Support Systems 34: 457–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Bidgoli, H. (1998). Intelligent Management Support Systems, Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar

  • Bottom, W.P. and Paese, P.W. (1999). Judgement Accuracy and the Asymmetric Cost of Errors in Distributive Bargaining, Group Decision and Negotiation 8: 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Bui, T. and Jarke, M. (1986). Communication Design for Co-op: A group decision support system, ACM Transaction on Office Information Systems 4(2): 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Carlsson, S., Brezillon, P., Humphreys, P., Lunberg, B.G., McCosh, A. and Rajkovic, V. (eds.) (2000). Proceedings of IFIP TC8/WG8.3 International Conference on Decision Support Through Knowledge Management, Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University/Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

  • Carlsson, S.A. and Lundberg, B.G. (2000). Preface and Introduction, in Proceedings of IFIP TC8/WG8.3 International Conference on Decision Support Through Knowledge Management, Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University/Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

  • Cavaye, A.L.M. (1996). Case Study Research: A multi-faceted research approach for IS, Information Systems Journal 6: 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Chaudhury, A. (1995). A Process Perspective to Designing Individual Negotiation Support Systems, Group Decision and Negotiation 4(6): 525–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, M. (1995). A Model-driven Approach to Accessing Managerial Information: The development of a repository-based executive information system, Journal of Management Information Systems 11(4): 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, W.S. and Hirschheim, R. (2004). A Paradigmatic and Methodological Examination of Information Systems Research from 1991 to 2001, Information Systems Journal 14: 197–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Codd, E.F., Codd, S.B. and Salley, C.T. (1993). Providing On-line Analytical Processing (OLAP) to User-analysts: An IT mandate, E.F. Codd and Associates. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

  • Cooper, B.L., Watson, H.J., Wixom, B.H. and Goodhue, D.L. (2000). Data Warehousing Supports Corporate Strategy at First American Corporation, MIS Quarterly 24(4): 547–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Courbon, J.C., Grajew, J. and Tolovi, J. (1978). Design and Implementation of Interactive Decision Support Systems: An Evolutive Approach, Technical Report, Institute d’Administration des Enterprises, Grenoble: France.Google Scholar

  • Datta, A. and Thomas, H. (1999). The Cube Data Model: A conceptual model and algebra for on-line analytical processing in data warehouses, Decision Support Systems 27: 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Davison, R. (1999). An Instrument for Measuring Meeting Success: Revalidation and Modification, Information and Management 36: 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Dearden, J. (1972). MIS is a Mirage, Harvard Business Review 50(1): 90–99.Google Scholar

  • Dennis, A.R., George, J.F., Jessup, L.M., Nunamaker Jr, J.F. and Vogel, D.R. (1988). Information Technology to Support Group Meetings, MIS Quarterly 12(4): 591–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Dennis, A.R. and Gallupe, R.B. (1993). A History of Group Support Systems Empirical Research: Lessons learned and future directions, in L.M. Jessup and J.S. Valacich (eds.) Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, New York: Macmillan, Chapter 3.Google Scholar

  • DeSanctis, G. and Gallupe, R.B. (1985). Group Decision Support Systems: A new frontier, Data Base 16(2): 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • DeSanctis, G. and Gallupe, R.B. (1987). A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems, Management Science 33(5): 589–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Devlin, B.A. and Murphy, P.T. (1988). An Architecture for a Business and Information System, IBM Systems Journal 27(1): 60–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Doukidis, G.I., Land, F. and Miller, G. (1989). Knowledge Based Management Support Systems, Chichester: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar

  • Dubin, R. (1978). Theory Building, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

  • Eisenhart, K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review 14: 532–550.Google Scholar

  • Eom, H.B. and Lee, S.M. (1990). A Survey of Decision Support System Applications (1971–1988), Interfaces 20: 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Eom, S.B. (1995). Decision Support Systems Research: Reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition, Omega: The International Journal of Management Science 23(5): 511–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Eom, S.B. (1996). Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Research in Decision Support Systems Through Author Cocitation Analysis (1971–1993), Decision Support Systems 16(4): 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Eom, S.B. (1999). Decision Support Systems Research: Current state and trends, Industrial Management and Data Systems 99(5): 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Eom, S.B. and Lee, S.M. (1993). Leading US Universities and Most Influential Contributors in DSS Research: A citation analysis, Decision Support Systems 9(3): 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Fitzgerald, B. (2000). System Development Methodologies: The problem of tenses, Information Technology and People 13(3): 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Fitzgerald, G. (1992). Executive Information Systems and their Development in the U.K.: A research study, International Information Systems 1(2): 1–35.Google Scholar

  • Fraser, N.M. and Hippel, K.W. (1984). Conflict Analysis: Models and resolution, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

  • Galliers, R.D. (1992). Choosing Information Systems Research Approaches, in R.D. Galliers (ed.), Information Systems Research: Issues, methods and practical guidelines, London: Blackwell Scientific, pp. 144–162.Google Scholar

  • Galliers, R.D. (1994). Relevance and Rigour in Information Systems Research: Some personal reflections on issues facing the information systems research community, in B.C. Glasson, I.T. Hawryszkiewycz, B.A. Underwood and R. Weber (eds.) Business Process Re-engineering: Information systems opportunities and challenges, Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland, pp. 93–101.Google Scholar

  • Gillenson, M.L. and Stutz, J.D. (1991). Academic Issues in MIS: Journals and books, MIS Quarterly 15(4): 447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Gorry, G.A. and Scott Morton, M.S. (1971). A Framework for Management Information Systems, Sloan Management Review 13(1): 1–22.Google Scholar

  • Gray, P., Aronofsky, J.S., Helmer, O., Kane, G.R. and Perkins, T.E. (1981). The SMU Decision Room Project. Proceedings of DSS-81: The First International Conference on Decision Support Systems (Atlanta, GA, 8–10 June 1981).Google Scholar

  • Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research, in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 105–117.Google Scholar

  • Hardgrave, B.C. and Walstrom, K.A. (1997). Forums for MIS Scholars, Communications of the ACM 40(11): 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J. and Ram, S. (2004). Design Science in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly 28(1): 75–106.Google Scholar

  • Hirschheim, R. (1992). Information Systems Epistemology: An historical perspective, in R. Galliers (ed.), Information Systems Research: Issues, methods and practical guidelines, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 28–60.Google Scholar

  • Holsapple, C., Johnson, L., Manakyan, H. and Tanner, J. (1994). Business Computing Research Journals: A normalized citation analysis, Journal of Management Information Systems 11(1): 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Huber, G.P. (1984). Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems, MIS Quarterly 8(3): 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Iivari, J. (1991). A Paradigmatic Analysis of Contemporary Schools of IS Development, European Journal of Information Systems 1(4): 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Inmon, W. and Hackathorn, R. (1994). Using the Data Warehouse, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Jarke, M., Jelassi, M.T. and Shakun, M.F. (1987). MEDIATOR: Toward a negotiation support system, European Journal of Operations Research 31(3): 314–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Jelassi, M.T., Kersten, G. and Zionts, S. (1990). An Introduction to Group Decision and Negotiation Support, in M.T. Jelassi, G. Kersten, and S. Zionts (eds.) Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating strategy into action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

  • Karim, A.S., Hershauer, J.C. and Perkins, W.C. (1998). A Simulation of Partial Information Use in Decision Making: Implications for DSS design, Decision Sciences 29(1): 53–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Keen, P.G.W. (1980). Adaptive Design for Decision Support System, Data Base 12(1–2): 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Keen, P.G.W. (1997). Let’s Focus on Action not Information: Information is a misleading and damaging IS term, Computerworld 31(46): 100.Google Scholar

  • Keen, P.G.W. and Gambino, A.J. (1983). Building a Decision Support System: The Mythical Man-month Revisited, in J.L. Bennett (ed.) Readings in Decision Support Systems, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

  • Keen, P.G.W. and Scott Morton, M.S. (1978). Decision Support Systems: An organisational perspective, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

  • Kendall, K.E. (1997). The Significance of Information Systems Research on Emerging Technologies: Seven information technologies that promise to improve managerial effectiveness, Decision Sciences 28(4): 775–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Kersten, G.E. (1987). On Two Roles Decision Support can Play In negotiation, Information Processing and Management 23(5): 605–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Kersten, G.E. and Szapiro, T. (1986). Generalized Approach to Modelling Negotiation, European Journal of Operations Research 26(1): 142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Kimball, R. (1996). The Data Warehousing Toolkit, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Kimball, R., Reeves, L., Ross, M. and Thornwaite, W. (1998). The Data Warehousing Lifecycle Toolkit, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • King, J.L. and Lyytinen, K. (2004). Reach and Grasp, MIS Quarterly 28(4): 539–551.Google Scholar

  • Kock, N. (1998). Can Communication Medium Limitations Foster Better Group Outcomes? An Action Research Study, Information and Management 34: 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Konsynski, B.R., Kottemann, J.E., Nunamaker Jr, J.F. and Stott, J.W. (1985). PLEXSYS-84: An integrated development environment for information systems, Journal of Management Information Systems 1(3): 64–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Kraemer, K.L. and King, J.L. (1988). Computer-based Systems for Cooperative Work and Group Decision Making, ACM Computing Surveys 20(2): 115–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Kuhn, H.W. and Tucker, A.W. (eds.) (1950). Contributions to the Theory of Games (Annals of Mathematics Study No. 24), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lewis, L.F., Keleman, K.S. and Garcia, J.E. (1996). Possible Barriers and Challenges to the Adoption of Group Support Systems, Group Decision and Negotiation 6(2): 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Linton, J.D. and Johnston, D.A. (2000). A Decision Support System for Planning Remanufacturing at Nortel Networks, Interfaces 30(6): 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Lowry, P.B., Romans, D. and Curtis, A. (2004). Global Journal Prestige and Supporting Disciplines: A scientometic study of information systems journals, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5(2): 29–77.Google Scholar

  • Malone, T.W. and Crowston, K. (1994). The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination, ACM Computing Surveys 26(1): 87–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • McCosh, A.M. (2004). Keynote Address. The 2004 IFIP International Conference on Decision Support Systems (IFIP, Prato, Italy).Google Scholar

  • McCosh, A.M. and Scott Morton, M.S. (1978). Management Decision Support Systems, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • McGrath, J.E. and Hollingshead, A.B. (1993). Putting the ‘Group’ Back in Group Support Systems’: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements, in L.M. Jessup and J.S. Valacich (eds.) Group Support Systems: New perspectives, New York: Macmillan, Chapter 4.Google Scholar

  • Meador, C.L. and Ness, D.N. (1974). Decision Support Systems: An approach to corporate planning, Sloan Management Review 15(2): 51–68.Google Scholar

  • Meredith, R., Shanks, G., Arnott, D. and Carlsson, S (eds.) (2004). Decision Support in a Complex and Uncertain World. Proceedings of the 2004 IFIP International Conference on Decision Support Systems (IFIP, Prato, Italy).Google Scholar

  • Mills, K. (2004). Raiding the Data Bank, The Australian IT Business, 16 October, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar

  • Mintzberg, H. (1977). Impediments to the Use of Managerial Information (National Association of Accountants, New York and the Society of Management Accountants of Canada, Ontario, Canada).Google Scholar

  • Morris, H.D., Graham, S., Andersen, P., Moser, K.D., Carr, M., Blumstein, R., Vesset, D. and Martinez, N. (2003). Financial Impact of Business Analytics: The key findings. IDC White Paper, 23 January.Google Scholar

  • Mylonopoulos, N.A. and Theoharakis, V. (2001). On-Site: Global perceptions of IS journals, Communications of the ACM 44(9): 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Nandhakumar, J. (1996). Executive Information System Development: A case study of a manufacturing company, Journal of Information Technology 11: 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Nash, J. (1950). The Bargaining Problem, Econometrica 18(2): 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Nash, J. (1953). Two-person Cooperative Games, Econometrica 21(1): 128–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • NCR (1998). How to Build a Data Warehouse, Data Warehousing Workshop: Module 4. [Course notes] NCR Corporation.Google Scholar

  • Ness, D.N. (1975). Interactive Systems: Theories of Design, in Proceedings of the Joint Wharton/ONR Conference on Interactive Information and DSS, The Wharton School: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

  • Nunamaker Jr, J.F., Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Vogel, D.R. and George, J.F. (1991). Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work, Communications of the ACM 34(7): 40–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Nurmi, H. (2001). Resolving Group Choice Paradoxes using Probabilistic and Fuzzy Concepts, Group Decision and Negotiation 10: 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.J. (1991). Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research approaches and assumptions, Information Systems Research 2: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Pearson, J.M. and Shim, J.P. (1994). An Empirical Investigation into Decision Support Systems Capabilities: A proposed taxonomy, Information and Management 27(1): 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Pervan, G.P. (1998). A Review of Research in Group Support Systems: Leaders, approaches and directions, Decision Support Systems 23(2): 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Pervan, G.P. and Atkinson, D.J. (1995). GDSS Research: An overview and historical analysis, Group Decision and Negotiation 4(6): 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Poon, P. and Wagner, C. (2001). Critical Success Factors Revisited: Success and failure cases of information systems for senior executives, Decision Support Systems 30: 393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Powell, P.L. and Johnson, J.E.V. (1995). Gender and DSS Design: The research implications, Decision Support Systems 14: 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Press, L. (1992). Lotus Notes (Groupware) in Context, Journal of Organizational Computing 2: 315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Raiffa, H. (1982). The Art and Science of Negotiation, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

  • 0 Replies to “Decision Support Systems Research Papers”

    Lascia un Commento

    L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *